Poultry manure methane emissions
[edit / update model]Summary
This methodology represents methane (CH4) emissions associated with the management and storage of poultry manure. The data and calculation methodology is sourced from the IPCC, as published in Volume 4, Chapter 10 - Emissions from Livestock and Manure Management of their 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.
The methodology
Emissions model
The decomposition of manure under anaerobic conditions (i.e., in the absence of oxygen), during storage and treatment, produces CH4. These conditions occur most readily when large numbers of animals are managed in a confined area (e.g., dairy farms, beef feedlots, and swine and poultry farms), and where manure is disposed of in liquid-based systems.
This emissions methodology is based upon emissions factors which describe the typical rate at which manure-associated CH4 is produced by single 'heads' of livestock (i.e. individual animals) and are expressed on an annual basis. These data are based on typical volatile solid excretion rates and maximum methane production capacities for each specific livestock type as well as manure => methane conversion factors weighted according to the manure management type mix specific to each regional context and indicative annual temperature.
Annual emission rates for a population or sub-population of livestock (e.g. kg / year) are calculated by multiplying the per animal emissions rates by the total number of livestock under consideration.
This methodology represents the IPCC Tier 1 approach.
Model data
The rate at which CH4 is emitted ultimately depends on the quantity of manure decomposing anaerobically, which, in turn, depends on the number of animals, the rate of waste production per animal, and how the manure is managed. When manure is stored or treated as a liquid (e.g., in lagoons, ponds, tanks, or pits), it decomposes anaerobically and can produce a significant quantity of CH4. In these cases, the temperature and duration of storage greatly affect the amount of CH4 produced. Where manure is handled as a solid (e.g., in stacks or piles) or deposited on pastures and rangelands, it tends to decompose under more aerobic conditions and less CH4 is produced (biogenic CO2 is produced instead). The typical mix of management practices employed varies with geographic location and/or developmental context.
As such, emissions factors for a broad range of scenarios are provided within this methodology. A total of 18 specific scenarios are represented, differentiated by poultry type (e.g., layers, broilers, ducks), geographic/developmental context (e.g., developed country, developing country) and typical temperature regime (e.g. cool (<15 °C), temperate (15-25 °C) and warm (>25 °C)).
Poultry for developing countries are represented by a generic poultry type only, with emissions differentiated only by temperature, and not by distinct poultry type.
Each scenario is represented by an annual manure-associated methane emissions rate per individual animal (kg / yr). In addition, the methodology uses the global warming potential of CH4 to convert absolute emissions quantities into CO2e - the quantity of CO2 which would exert the same atmospheric warming effect.
Activity data required
Methane emissions are directly proportionate to the total population of poultry kept. The total number of poultry under consideration must therefore be specified in order to make an emissions calculation.
Calculation and results
This emissions calculated by this methodology represent those attributable to the specified population of livestock over a period of 1 year.
The methodology calculates two emissions quantities: (1) the absolute quantity of methane associated with the livestock population; and (2) methane emissions expressed in terms of CO2e - the quantity of CO2 which would exert the same atmospheric warming effect.
Additional information
Nomenclature
Following IPCC advice, the term manure is used collectively to include both dung and urine (i.e., the solids and the liquids) produced by livestock.
Related methodologies
Analogous methodologies are also available focussing on cattle and swine and other livestock CH4 emissions associated with manure management.
UID | Label |
---|---|
6RZO0QSV6824 | developed country, broilers, cool |
QB1URQBE4VOF | developed country, broilers, temperate |
ZJ0YYUTIONF1 | developed country, broilers, warm |
JIR3X96D4K05 | developed country, ducks, cool |
QVOELYUHZ3S0 | developed country, ducks, temperate |
U6F5KW6VI5DH | developed country, ducks, warm |
XD3PW39U10GB | developed country, layers (dry), cool |
TMSJLW73LSYO | developed country, layers (dry), temperate |
P16OIKNOS6VK | developed country, layers (dry), warm |
KS24AN70G9GY | developed country, layers (wet), cool |
X59Z2KI5YHDQ | developed country, layers (wet), temperate |
DTUCZVVCHWRB | developed country, layers (wet), warm |
BJKZ4DLPI66F | developed country, turkeys, cool |
OU4BSWZW76F3 | developed country, turkeys, temperate |
GRQN0FAK1AW5 | developed country, turkeys, warm |
AU6KL49GHXW8 | developing country, cool |
WVBZRSYS7KZR | developing country, temperate |
II3TXOD5128M | developing country, warm |